Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 48-52, February 2004

Educational issues in oral care

  • Betty T. Daniel

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Betty T. Daniel, MS, RN, AOCN®, 1502 Enclave Pkwy, No. 205, Houston, TX 77077, USA
  • ,
  • Kathryn L. Damato

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
  • ,
  • Judith Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Healthquest, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract 

To discuss the importance of patient, family, and health care professional education in enhancing oral care and adherence to treatment regimens.

Textbooks, review articles, and research studies.

Oral complications of cancer therapy influence both patient outcomes and fiscal outcomes. Patient awareness of the importance of oral health improves adherence to the oral care standard. However, the lack of knowledge of health professionals is a barrier to implementing patient education and oral care standards.

Curriculum should incorporate oral assessment and oral hygiene. Training of oncology nurses must include assessment, prevention, and treatment of oral mucositis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0749-2081(03)00139-6

doi:10.1053/j.soncn.2003.10.008

Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 48-52, February 2004